On Feb 1, 2008 4:47 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/02/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 02/02/2008, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> That was the original idea, I agree, but we've moved on from that.
Not remotely. Vast majority of our information is uncited.
And that's a bag thing.
I assume you meant "bad"
In my opinion, yes - it would be nice to have a cite for everything.
It's also a horrible mistake to, for example, run through WP articles
and either delete everything that isn't cited, or all articles without
RS, or both.
Indeed.
It's important to remember that {{fact}} means "This fact is
uncited, so you, the reader, might want to take it with more
grains of salt than usual." It most certainly does *NOT* mean,
"this uncited fact will be deleted forthwith if you, the POV
editor who inserted it, do not supply a citation (to my
satisfaction) pronto."
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: