On 4/7/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name>
wrote:
http://www.thisistrue.com/zt.html
That mindset dislikes letting the "authorities" have any discretion to
use common sense in administering rules depending on the circumstances;
they'd rather have an absoulute rule, enforced absolutely ([[Judge
Dredd]] style). You see a lot of that both on Wikipedia and in the
outside world these days; too many people want to simplify a complex
world by being absolutist in their following of rules.
On Usenet once I proposed an alternate rational for "zero tolerance"
in some cases. An example I used was "weapon like" items carried by
school children. Take this scenario.
1. A white (or black) student is caught with a key chain that's sharp
enough to possibly be used as a weapon. The principal makes a
determination that the student didn't know it was not allowed and lets
him off with a warning.
2. A black (or white) student is caught with a switchblade knife and expelled.
3. The black (or white) student's parents, with the support of Al
Sharpton (or David Duke), sues the school for racial discrimination
arguing that the administration gives preferential treatment to white
(or black) students caught with weapons.
To avoid the possibility of having to spend taxpayer dollars defending
such a suit, (frivolous or otherwise) the school simply chooses to
follow a zero tolerance rule to the letter so they can say that
everybody gets treated equally.
This only proves that it's easier to punish everybody than to face the
real problem. If the school is not acting out of racial discrimination
it should be prepared to resist the suit.
Ec