Sending one message to the list is quite enough.
If you are talking about reversions like
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=365403…
then
Eliezer was quite right to make them. Articles are about facts, and
questioning the validity of any of them, should happen on the talk page.
Where and when did you post those concerns on the talk page? Just tagging is
not enough.
I've seen several people tag the article as totally disputed without putting
any discussion on the talk page.
It would help a lot of you posted diff links to the edits you are referring
to see WP:DIFF.
About the first editorial comment. If the article says Messianic Judaism
started in the 1800s, then are you sure Judaism was actually called
Messianic in the 1490s? Jews may have died during Crusades or at the hands
of Queen Isabelle, but they may simply be a completely different form of
Judaism altogether.
Mgm
On 1/26/06, david weiss <loveisrael(a)mail.com> wrote:
eliezer imposes an unfair, seriously biased and inaccurate article
dealing with messianic judaism. when i had previously raised my concerns
in the discussion page and point out the gross misinformation in the main
article, eliezar would delete my tag. (as a side note, i observed others
tag this article as violating the npov policy only to have their tags
deleted without explanation.)
i expressed my concerns on the talk page, only to be vandalised by
OpenInfo and blocked by Eliezer. Eliezer prevented me from explaining:
1. where the npov policy was violated in several places; 2. show where
the facts were seriously inaccurate and, 3. show where the author
contradicted himself. eliezer blocked me without sufficient warning per
the blocking policy.
while i strongly disagree with eliezer's anti-messianic agenda, i do not
feel i vandalized the article or site in any way. this site's policy
allows me the freedom to edit articles that violate the npov in a good
faith effort to make them more accurate.
i believe eliezer will only force his anti-messianic agenda upon the
public and a new administrator needs to be appointed who will fairly
address the topic. thank you for your prompt and open-minded attention
to this matter.
--
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE!
http://games.mail.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l