69.139.6.164
For your convenience, that is comcast, and their whois record is too short,
so I do not know where.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:71.107.165.252&action=ed…
That is Verizon in Reston, Virginia. Right state, wrong city, depending on
technology available. I was thinking that Verizon could, under normal load
conditions, keep users in the same 64k block of IP#s, and I do not know that
they even try.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:67.233.195.172&action=ed…
That is
EMBARQSERVICES.NET in Winter Park, Florida.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:88.109.84.158&action=edi…
http://www.tiscali.co.uk
20 Broadwick Street
London W1F 8HT
+44 207 087 2000
abuse-mailbox: abuse(a)uk.tiscali.com
(There is a list of repeated, identical messages of warning via tiscali that
are misidentified as death threats on his checkuser page.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:68.110.105.92&action=edi…
Cox Communications, Atlanta.
That's all I get without calling up their web site.
Reporting address should be abuse(a)cox.com
213.114.174.153
address: Box 47645
address: 117 94 Stockholm
address: Sweden
abuse-mailbox: abuse at
bredband.com
If it's all the same guy, then maybe he really does know something about
piracy. The rest of them hav convenient links to whois information. Last
time I checked, they also worked.