Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote: On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:57:21
-0400, Katefan0 wrote:
What's the point, really? You've already
admitted you're a sock of
Halliburton Shill. Your email address is halliburton_shill(a)yahoo.com.
Exactly why are you protesting findings of that to which you've already
admitted?
Point of information: he acknowledges that he previously edited as
Halliburton Shill, but that he no longer does - as I understand it
because the username was deemed inappropriate. That is different.
Guy (JzG)
Thank you, JzG. That's more or less accurate. I was actually told by admins to get a
new username because Halliburton Shill would not be allowed. I was not blocked from using
Wiki, nor did I use Pro-Lick to re-vote on Halliburton Shill issues. Everything can be
more or less found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Halliburton_Shill
But it really should be kept in mind that it has nothing to do with the checkuser errors
I'm addressing here.~~~~Pro-Lick
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.