No just redundant, but wrong - there are clear
deletion guidelines that have criteria.
Mark
--- Phil Sandifer <sandifer(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose it would be needlessly redundant to point
out once again that
the deletion criteria to which you refer do not
actually exist?
-Snowspinner
On Oct 25, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Mark Richards wrote:
We have criteria for deletion (the blueprint).
A small group of people have decided that we want
to
delete things that don't meet the criteria.
They
are
steadily going through, listing 20-30 articles
per
day
(most of which don't meet the criteria),
knowing
that
a percentage of these will get deleted anyway
because
no one else is willing to spend as much time as
they
are (it has taken me about an hour today alone to
try
to vote on all of the school articles).
Mark
--- John Lee <johnleemk(a)gawab.com> wrote:
> Then that's wrong, obviously. I don't really
> understand what point
> you're trying to make here.
>
> John Lee
> ([[User:Johnleemk]])
>
> Mark Richards wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it would help if someone deleted the
>> blueprint? Or, after everyone had agreed to use
>> bricks, someone started pulling them out,
because a
>> small group of builders decided that,
although
> bricks
>> were on the blueprint, they would rather not
have
>> them.
>> Mark
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around