On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
David Goodman wrote:
This is a proposal that will encourage
administrators to not act
responsibly, by destroying the principle that an administrative action
can be overturned by another administrator.
That's in fact one of the core assumptions of administratorship, and the
reason we keep emphasizing that it's "no big deal". Being an
administrator *must not* give anyone unilateral special powers---only
give them janitorial tasks, that anyone else can undo if there wasn't
community consensus for the original change. Such a huge policy change
change is a significant overstep of the Arbitration Committee's
authority, and therefore cannot be regarded as binding.
-Mark
It can be regarded as binding in the sense that at the moment if you
don't comply with it, you'll be desysoped or banned (or, not xor).
WilyD