Right. We should remember this only applies to modifited versions of
the Document. If Wikipedia wanted to make the claim that it's not
transferring between separately licensed individual documents when
text goes from one page to the next, I have trouble seeing how that
can be argued with.
Then again it's preferable for a host of reasons to act as if each
page is a separate Document and we make sure to comply as much as
possible with the conditions covering Modified Versions.
On 6/7/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 6/7/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/7/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I would love it if those who profess to care
about pure GFDL
compliance would do something about restoring the lost edit histories
in the 2001-2002 period of a large number of entries.
Eh they should all have picked up 5 more principle authors by now.
The GFDL requires you to credit *all* authors, not just 5. 5 have to be on
the title page (where Wikipedia currently has none). They all have to be in
the section entitled History.
There are lots of places where Wikipedia is *materially* non-compliant with
the GFDL. Crediting of users who have made no attempt to identify
themselves is not, IMHO, one of them.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l