On 29/02/2008, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh I agree, but I think when we're talking about
having a higher bar for
RfBs (which I also don't agree with) then restricting who can vote makes
more sense than changing the passing %. A % sufficient to show consensus is
a % sufficient to show consensus, in other words, but if you want you can
have a "consensus of trusted editors."
True, but RfA/B isn't about consensus, it's about "rough consensus"
(which bares next to no relation to actual consensus). We could
restrict RfB to trusted editors, but you would need to define trusted
editors more broadly than just admins.