"Stephen Bain" wrote
I'm sure they have real concerns, and I'm
also sure that there are
probably more errors in WP than in EB. The point is that WP can fix
its errors far more quickly than traditional encyclopaedias, and we
should use this opportunity to show that.
It would be cool to manoeuvre EB into fact-checking our articles. With
enough EBs, any error is shallow, to coin a phrase.
Hrm...
How about a bounty system for errors? Provided you can back up your
claim, you get some reward...
--
Alphax -
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: