On Feb 1, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
We now do require people
source things, we just aren't very good at enforcing it (I believe it
was Jimbo that said people shouldn't be tagging dubious statements
with {{fact}}, they should just be removing them completely).
{{fact}}
Or, to be less cavalier, we now require sourcing as the major way to
resolve accuracy disputes. We do not, as a matter of policy, and never
have required sourcing for things that nobody is suspicious of, and we
do not encourage any sort of Cartesian doubt.
Or, if we do, it's a new and foolish development.
-Phil