On Nov 15, 2007 4:36 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 16/11/2007, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's not "could have made". The
issue is not settled until either:
* A working "actual agreement" consensus is achieved on-wiki, or...
* Everyone who is pro-spoiler-warnings and able to fight the multilevel
policy fight (such as a few of us here) choses explicitly rather than
implicity to simply let it go.
While there are ways to overturn it at this stage most of them would
require a fair bit of luck and/or would be extremely hard to do.
We have no policy that says that we can't have spoiler warnings. We have a
"last edit standing" consensus.
Those are by definition unstable and unenforcable.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com