On 5/3/07, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
The
proper response is to allow the number on Wikipedia, but ban its use
as spam, not to completely ban it in any form whatsoever.
It is foolish for anyone with assets that could be levied on to display the number.
It is foolish for anyone with assets that could be levied on to host a
publicly accessible encyclopedia that anyone can edit, where edits go
live immediately. =]
We're reasonably well covered for random "someone came by and
published something without our knowing". Same logic by which ISPs
and so forth are protected.
When "we" can be shown to have known about the illegal behavior, though...
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com