This is my first post here. Heya. I'm woohookitty. He of 10 gazillion
edits. :) Anyway, I agree with Sean here. The arbcom cannot get rid of
afd even if they wanted to. They cannot nuke it from orbit. I can't
even see how it could come up in an arbcom case. They take user
conduct disputes, not policy disputes per se. Mike
On 1/28/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
I'm not going to get involved with this. At
this stage the only thing
that can help Wikipedia's deletion process is to have it nuked from
orbit. Only the Foundation can do that, if the new arbitration
committee is too scared to act.
The Arbitration Committee is a judiciary, not a legislature. We weren't
elected to design and implement organizational structures and processes.
Until we have a case, we have nothing to do. When are we going to see
"Tony Sidaway v. Afd" on our docket?
- --
Sean Barrett | Some days it's just not worth filing
sean(a)epoptic.org | the environmental impact statement.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD24+5MAt1wyd9d+URAjnaAJ9JvLufYWOGk4pZ3B8fTL8Jn0LBZgCfSYnD
AJ4uCucC/+Yv96Hggg6mAS0=
=dUOd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l