Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Hmm, I thought such "criticism sections" had
been deprecated for quite a
few years now. One thing to do is to add {{criticism section}}, the
wording of which is what I recall (that criticism is better integrated
into an article). In the hugeness case the integration would make the
article look like the "attack article" it probably is.
None of WP:CRIT, WP:NOCRIT and WP:CRIS addressing the issue seem to have made it past
being an essay into a guideline.
Strange, isn't it Charles, that the deprecation of criticism
sections/articles would be the convention for "quite a few years now"
and yet no attempt at its formalization has "made it past being an
essay into a guideline" let alone policy?
Stranger still, is it not, that this same invisible notion can still
find abuse as the centerpiece of a large-enough edit war such that
resulted in the poorly-conceptualized case given (disrespectfully) the
Prez' name?
More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with
adjudicating policy and sections therein.
- Stevertigo