On 12/05/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> To sum up: We need independent and reliable
sources on a subject so that
>> information is -verified- and -neutral-, and so that we need not use
>> -original research- to interpret that ourselves. We're -not- an
>> indiscriminate collection information, and we've generally demonstrated
>> -consensus- to delete articles which do not meet these criteria.
Actually, really nothing. If you like the first
sentence, I think it
would stand on its own.
I'd say "verifiable" instead, as that's the verb of
"verifiability" -
which is subtly different, but important. Otherwise, excellent. Now
how to get everyone else to think it's a good idea ...
- d.