On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Chris Howie <cdhowie(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Chris Howie
<cdhowie(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Silas Snider
<swsnider(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Interestingly, after viewing the original image, it actually looks as
though the baby image is taped onto the monitor using what looks to be
a strip of tape (the fuzzy line) (which would explain the image
extending past the monitor)
This is possible, but it doesn't seem so to me. The strip contains
what appears to be colored random noise. Not sure how you'd get those
random colors from a strip of tape, unless it was really oily or
something...
In addition, the image is way too sharp as compared with the
surroundings, as pointed out by Mathias. If it were taped on I would
expect it to be just as in (or out of) focus as the monitor itself.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It doesn't appear to be a taped on image, physically placed on the screen.
It looks like a pretty hacked up/weak Photoshopping, to augment the image on
the screen. I've attached a zoomed in view of the image of the lower left
corner of the monitor for the curious. The pixel heavy strip across the
screen... I don't know that was originally, but it's clearly not physical
tape on the actual monitor. It's something inside the smaller image they
attempted to impose in there. This image would be a candidate for
http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/ if it were professionally published
somewhere.
- Joe