On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:30:40 -0500, "Alec Conroy"
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm just saying-- if we CAN cover ED in a NPOV,
Verifiable, NOR way,
we absolutely should. Another feather in the cap, another trophy in
the case-- as indeed, all our articles are.
And given the number of ED fans still active on Wikipedia you may be
reasonably sure that this is exactly what would happen.
The problem with ED is, as David notes above, that it is legendary
only in its own mind. It almost went bust earlier this year.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG