On 5/5/06, charles matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Guettarda" wrote
Do you think that a WikiProject Surnames might be
in order?
There is certainly enough to do - an essentially unlimited field, you
could
say.
<snip>
That's one issue. Another is that WikiProjects can appear much better at
prescribing rules to do the work, than at actually doing it.
That was actually what made me think that a WikiProject might be useful -
the issues you outlined about potentially changing the rules for {{dab}}
pages for surnames.
On the other hand, if there's a chance of getting together people who know
their onomastics, with those with theories on how to
integrate and present
some genealogical information here (for example the boxes turning up on
[[Arnold J. Toynbee]] to show the relation to [[Polly Toynbee]]), and
others
who want to 'add value' to raw lists of names, it could be
interesting. I'm
pretty much a 'raw list' man myself; but a template for a surname page
ought
indeed to take into account a bit more.
Now the challenge is to find these people and get them together.