On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:51 PM, William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com> wrote:
On 04/30/2010 01:34 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
but the
general point
remains -- you can set a cookie for an
unregistered user and it will
work as you'd like, causing the user to skip the Squid cache on all
pages until the cookie expires.
This already happens when users edit.
Otherwise anons would never be
able to get the new messages indicator.
That's good to know. I'll pass this on to the team and we'll see what we
can come up with. One question for any interested stakeholder: is this
feature worth delaying launch to add? We have a number of nice-to-haves
on a list to work on right after launch, so development will continue.
Also, Howie Fung, the UI expert on the project comments:
We can always soften the message a bit by
changing the language, color
and/or providing a link with an explanation.
So if people have suggestions on how to improve any of that, on any
other aspect of the current implementation, please put them here:
http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:FlaggedRevs_issues
You could dangle a carrot and say "if your edit gets approved, you get a
prize!"
That would certainly raise a few eyebrows.
But seriously, the issue of encouraging people to edit is crucial.
Those who want to edit for malicious reasons will nearly always be
prepared to jump through hoops, and those most likely to be
discouraged by extra hoops to jump through will include those we want
to attract to become new and regular editors.
All in all, if what Greg describes can be done, that sounds best, even
if it seems a bit misleading.
Carcharoth