On 02/02/2008, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That was the original idea, I agree, but we've
moved on from that.
Not remotely. Vast majority of our information is uncited.
We
long ago accepted that simply adding what you know doesn't work
For the most part it does work.
since
there is no way for people to trust it.
I can produce fake cites that you could not reasonably check.
We now do require people
source things, we just aren't very good at enforcing it (I believe it
was Jimbo that said people shouldn't be tagging dubious statements
with {{fact}}, they should just be removing them completely).
Jimbo has very few article edits over the last year but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Church_of_Reality&diff=prev&a…
--
geni