But Cunc dealt with this. 'Verifiable' is an
in-principle thing. It is distinct from saying everyone can do homebrew fact-checking on
anything mentioned. Verifiability on Wikipedia can't simply be a sceptics'
charter: that really would be a problem.
Verifiable means we can actually verify it to be true. Not in
principle, but in practise. The whole point of verifiable sources is
that we can be sure we don't have things stated on Wikipedia that
aren't true - some vague kind of hypothetical verifiability doesn't
help that.