On 16/10/2007, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 16/10/2007, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
> James Farrar wrote:
> > Which, in itself, arguably might not be a
problem, provided there were
> > a sensible way of determining who "people we don't like" are,
and
> > assuming "we" means the community as a whole, not a small subset
> > thereof.
> In what way would institutionalizing a particular
POV in our content
> policies _not_ be a problem?
It would emphasise its own absurdity?
That's worked so far! Oh, wait.
Really, the problem with the BADSITES advocates claiming "our position
is not BADSITES, it was written by a troll" is that they then follow
with actions indistinguishable from BADSITES, and which ignore
reductio ad absurdum.
These people seriously wish to trash NPOV and consensus (or even
"consensus") for ... what precisely?
- d.