On 5/3/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I note we haven't even had a takedown notice yet.
To send a takedown notice the MPAA would have to find a case where the
number is up (it is but not too easy to find)
Note also that Wikipedia is a really bad site to sue
when the article
is academically entirely defensible. Not even the Scientologists,
famed for their chutzpah, have tried.
Scientology largely gave up on those kind of lawsuits before wikipedia
came along.
We would have *incredible*
numbers of friends.
I don't know of any court system where number of friends is a
significant factor in the final judgement.
I really doubt we're in danger, and if they were
to try they'd be
utterly, utterly fucked. The skies would turn black with fully armed
combat ninja pro bono First Amendment lawyers.
So? Other forms of IP have not been found to break the 1st amendment.
So far everything I've seen from actual lawyers suggests that this
form doesn't either.
--
geni