On Jan 3, 2008 1:28 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I also thought
of something while waiting for your response. If
maintenance is the problem, wouldn't protection be better than
deletion? Instead of deleting 80% of articles on "universities" to
reduce the maintenance load, why not protect them on a rotating
schedule where 20% are unprotected each day during a five day period?
Because articles are created with maintenance problems
I for one don't have a problem with deleting articles which have
always sucked and can't be trivially fixed.
and restricting editing on the scale is not
acceptable.
But deleting articles on this scale is acceptable? Doesn't article
deletion restrict editing?