On 14/08/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source (specifically
disclaimed); your
logic, taken to its conclusion, would suggest that we cannot use
negative incidents in our own edit histories as discussion fodder for
RFAs.
Didn't we rehash this debate recently? A source can be generally
unreliable and yet still reliable for the purposes of determining what
it itself said...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk