* A. Nony Mouse wrote:
Excuse me while I have a good laugh. You've been
trying to drive people
like me, who honestly want wikipedia reformed, onto wikipediareview (so
that you can say "oh it's just whining from wikipediareview, we should
destroy them") for months now.
As none of that sounds remotely familiar I'll assume you are using some
sort of collective form of "you".
I'm just going to sit back and eat some popcorn
and enjoy watching them
make fun of YOU now, Conrad, because that's all they're doing.
That's ok. I'm a big boy. I can take it.
You've
raised valid points just as I did, and they're not taking you seriously,
just reiterating the same old Judge Dredd "I AM THE LAW" bullshit.
Bizarrely enough, >I< am also 'the law'... making these generalizations
perhaps somewhat simplistic. Wikipedia and its administration are made up
of a wide variety of people with different backgrounds and viewpoints.
Thus, attacking the institution or members/admins in general based on the
actions of individuals will always include an element of unjustified
criticism. Deal with individual problems rather than trashing the whole.