On 11/27/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/11/2007, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's good to hear. Arbcom will still have
to consider whether
participation in a secret list where secret evidence is presented is
an appropriate behavior, and of course, the arbiters who actually did
participate will need to recuse themselves from voting on that issue I
would hope.
I fear you are not making a lot of sense to me here.
You can't stop any editor talking to any other editor they want to
about anything.
If you think you can, I invite you to detail precisely what you plan
and why it's a good idea.
[[WP:CANVASS]] would be a good place to start-- if I made a mailing
list to talk about on-wiki behavior, posting notices about major
on-wiki happenings... if it ever got out, I would be banned before I
knew what hit me.
Another would proposal woudl be that when our admins screw up, we be
allowed to do a full postmortem to figure out just what went wrong and
how to stop it from happening again.
Requiring all evidence to be submitted ON-WIKI for admin review (or
else deferred to arbcom/office) would be another good step.
Alec