On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:51:29 +0000, "David Gerard"
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The naming (not even linking) of
antisocialmedia.net
was suppressed
per WP:NPA - a community rule being applied to article space. Don't be
obtuse.
Well, now, I thought that editorial consensus pretty rapidly formed
for mentioning but not linking. Is my memory at fault here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_site…
The first mention of "suppression" in the evidence for hat case
comes from Dan, stating that it was "suppressed" from ANI (where it
should indeed not have been linked, as a vile and baseless attack
and campaign of harassment against several people:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_site…
The Evidence page does not, at a quick re-scan, mention removal of
any *mention* of the name form the Bagley article, and I would
expect such a removal to last about as long as the good faith but
misguided removal of the links to
michaelmoore.com and
donmurphy.net.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG