On 11/10/2007, Wily D <wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Charles - okay, "not allowed" was pehaps too
strong language - but
this editor has definitely gotten a bit of a reprimand for asking what
is on it's face a reasonable question.
Yes. Having an arbitrator on the case in question immediately react
with "What's your purpose?" (in asking this) is, on the face of it, a
ridiculously paranoid and bad-faith attitude. That there may be long
and detailed reason for this doesn't make it less so.
- d.