On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:03 AM, xaosflux <xaosflux(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As to the inline signing v.s. mime attachments, the
former is much
easier to deal with, though the attachments are less likely to get
corrupted.
It is only easier to deal with when:
1) The sender does not have a user-agent capable of attaching signatures, or
2) The receiver does not have a mechanism to check such signatures.
Both of which, with the exception of web mail systems, should not be
issues today.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers