On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:56:30 +0000,
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Nominations under G1, G11, A1 and A7 all can be
problematic.
Careless use of terms "nonsense", "promotion", "no context",
"non-notable" should be deprecated. These are not synonyms with
"hard to read", "informative", "obscure topic",
"out-of-the-way or
annoying to me" (respectively). Basically we need to formulate
something that isolates a bit better where things fall down the
cracks in the system.
Right. So how to achieve that?
We have two classes of immediately deletable crap: attacks and
copyright violations (i.e. stuff that is actively harmful) and just
plain junk. Spam is in the latter category.
Attacks should go in the fast track, without doubt.
Self-evident autobiographies should be userfied per [[WP:BITE]].
Corporate vanity probably needs more attention, since they rarely go
away.
What would a new process look like?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG