John Lee wrote:
Nobody's disputing that in some cases, these
restrictions improve the
encyclopaedia. To assert that we improve the encyclopaedia by removing links
to any blog or forum which harasses our editors is a bit of a stretch,
nevertheless. In most cases, we don't link to these sites because there is
no good reason to; you are now asserting we should go further and never link
to them even if there is a good reason to.
Indeed, by priorising link removal
criteria, with emphasis on the more
easily defined ones, we would probably find that by the time we got down
the list to harassment there wouldn't be many left to fight about.
Ec