On 17 August 2012 12:36, Steven Zhang <cro0016(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So, I had a look at articles for creation today, and
there was nearly 1,000 pending article submissions. Articles for creation has changed a
lot since 2008 - it was of a similar structure to XFD - all submissions for a particular
day were on one page, and people could come along and approve or reject based in certain
criteria.
I think that system worked well. True, we have a lot more article creations, but I think
it gave more visibility than the current system where everything is subpaged.
Some may think that the bar at AFC is set too high but this high bar discourages new
users, especially when their submissions stay unreviewed for weeks at a time. And since
editor retention is something we are trying to focus on, it seems a worthy project since
many new users have their first experiences in AFC. The lack of volunteers in wikiprojects
like AFC is not a new thing, so it's not that volunteers have reduced. I think we need
to consider if AFC is something we still want to have, and if so, how can we improve it?
You are saying that there is a backlog (a problem of success), so the
thing is broken? I know attention-seeking rhetoric is normal in our
discussions, but what exactly is your logic? You preferred the older
system. I don't know what you are saying about the high bar.
Charles