That is even potentially helpful--if a COI person responds that way,
it's a good sign that the article may be very dubious indeed. If I
remove the detailed product list as advertising, with an explanation
that with it in, the article looks like advertising and is likely to
be deleted, and the editor immediately puts it back, that does tend to
show the purpose of the article, and I am much more likely to say G11.
On 7/15/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
> (I've found that if there is a COI involved offering to improve the
article backfires seriously--no one with a COI can see their own
crap.)
KP
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.