This is a proposal that will encourage administrators to not act
responsibly, by destroying the principle that an administrative action
can be overturned by another administrator. Any one of the 1100 or so
active administrators can delete material, tc. etc. and no one can
overturn it without a definite community consensus. any one of the
1100 can be as arbitrary as he pleases, and get away with it unless
the community is willing to actually actively oppose him. Thus, the
bias will be towards removing material--which perhaps is what some
people want with BLPs. Tell me, what would the reaction be if a
proposal were mooted that any one of the 1100 administrators could
mark BLP material as being kept, and could not be opposed without
similar agreement?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Sam Blacketer
<sam.blacketer(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 6/17/08, Wily D <wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm really unsure on what I think. ArbCom introducing new policy?
That's probably bad.
It is headed 'special enforcement' rather than 'special policy', and I
think
the distinction is more than merely terminological. The policy basis is
WP:BLP which has been in place for some time and has wide acceptance; I
agree it would be wrong for Arbcom to change that policy.
But how the community will respond is still up in the air and needs
voices. Recall that even though the ArbCom
introduced the
contraversial MONGO remedy, eventually the community pushed back until
it could no longer be applied farther than the original policy had
allowed. So if a lot of people are upset (and I've never seen so much
talk of open revolt), it probably is possible for the community to
collectively put this into a different, more well thought out form.
I believe this new provision will be workable, and with administrators
acting responsibly, will benefit the encyclopaedia. If we find this doesn't
happen then we will have to have a look again. However, I would be
disappointed if there is an organised campaign of resistance aimed at trying
to overturn the ruling ("open revolt"), more because that's just not the
way
we do things.
--
Sam Blacketer
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG