On 12/11/2007, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
What is an *extreme* POV very much depends on your own
POV.
People should get banned, if they are either harassing people,
violate 3RR or deliberately try to harm Wikipedia. I strongly
oppose admins, who block editors for having a specific POV.
For NPOV we actually /need/ editors with different POVs as
long as they can adept to a cooperative writing. Wikipedia
would lose a lot of perspectives, if only editors with
"genuine commitment to follow consensus" (majority view?)
are welcome.
I notice that you've been starting from an a priori assumption of bad
faith and adding theoretical considerations, whereas those answering
you are giving specific examples you're failing to take in.
- d.