On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:24:10 -0500, "Daniel R. Tobias"
<dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
But that's an error that's highly encouraged by
the current
prevailing mindset regarding banned users, where ensuring that
"banned is banned" and no appearance of a loophole must ever be given
takes precedence over the quality of the encyclopedia.
That is policy and has been for a long time.
How do you suggest we implement the policy of being "a little bit
banned" without leaving the doors wide open for rampant abuse?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG