On 24/04/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:25 AM, MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
P.S. Did that Barbara Bauer lawsuit ever actually
get to court or
was that
another empty threat?
I'm not sure. But the article got deleted because an admin decided
that "I'm unconvinced by the arguments that the sources are reliable"
is equivalent to "there is not a consensus that the sources are
reliable," and the usual fun at DRV failed to overturn it.
Not strictly accurate. The admin in question decided that "I'm
unconvinced by the arguments that the sources are reliable" is
equivalent to "there **is** a consensus that the sources **are not**
reliable". By the current rules, no consensus would result in status
quo, i.e. a keep.