On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM, <wjhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
Of course you've hit the nail right on the head.
I don't think we want to create a brand-new additional language that people have to
learn just to code
for Wikipedia.? What we'd want to do, is use an existing language, so that some
people can jump right
in with both feet and others, who want to, can pick up an instruction manual and start
stabbing about.
> If you'd like to propose a BASIC syntax for the tools we need, that
> might make the argument more cogent and viable. Of necessity you need
> to base that on a BASIC which is freeware and portable.
Um. Raw BASIC is not well structured to do the specific text
processing we're looking for.
You'd have to build templates up from raw code, without library tools,
accomplish what we do with the templates tools now.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com