-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Adminship is supposedly not a big deal, but it is. This is even
more clear when you look at Requests for Bureaucratship, where many
people vote oppose because "we don't need more bureaucrats". I know
this is off-topic, but I really think we should be looking into the
RfA process as well as AfD, because RfA appears to be becoming the
new VfD (yes, VfD). Last time, it was the "in" thing to bash VfD.
Now, it's the "in" thing to bash RfA, as anyone who spends some
time on our IRC channels should notice. This is worrying.
Never underestimate the overwhelming power of stupidity. In more
dangerous circumstances some of these people woud be candidates for
Darwin Awards. :-)
Being someone who votes oppose to RFBs if he thinks there isn't need
for new bureaucrats, you might want to be careful about what you say
to a mailing list. You aren't sending a private email to your buddy here.
- -Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDm6Ac6MKb8lYmCtcRAhz8AJ4xgS1Ea5X5KN77/5TNz6jSDwDrZACguh5J
UQSH0bLuB5bG+Q1JNhkdhIM=
=IHGC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----