Splitting the subject off of the sensible discussion that's going on...
"responding to it once during an arbcom hearing" is an interesting
way to describe using your entire user page as a sustained personal
attack. And what narrow specialist subject do you consider yourself
an expert on again? Political hatchet jobs?
-Snowspinner
On Jan 11, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
Enduring six months of personal attacks,
responding to it once
during an
ArbCom Hearing, and being banned for a year, while those who
trashed me and
smeared me as being "banned for personal attacks" are given license
to do it
again. This why the image and reputation of Wikipedia, and the
image and
reputation of editors contributing in good faith is everything.
nobs
On 1/11/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nobs01 wrote:
Take it from a user victimized by the concerted
efforts of
sockpuppet
trolls
given licence to run rampant throughout
Wikipedia: Reputation is
everything.
You were banned for personal attacks and placed on probation after
that for disruption:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/
Nobs01_and_others#Nobs01_banned_for_personal_attacks
Oddly enough, cases like yours are not what I was talking about.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: