James D. Forrester wrote:
We. Make. No.
Choices. For. Anyone.
Ah, but you do, by creating and maintaining the list of categories upon
which to block; this choice is POV.
How? A user can choose to filter on any category they want, or none at
all. Once again, this was proposed _for the explicit purpose_ of making
_no_ choices for the user but only giving them a feasible method to make
their own choices.
What if I'm offended by images of goats?
What's wrong with an "images of goats" category? Seems to me it would be
a useful category even without filtering.
Are you going to categorise every image in all
conceiveable ways just so
We already categorize pages in a great deal of (sometimes ridiculous)
ways. I don't see the problem.
that anyone can be rendered 'happy'? Really?
What about when you, I, and
everyone else committed to continuing with this have left (perhaps in a
century through death)?
I can't even make sense out of this question. If no one's around that
cares to continue it, then it's probably moot at that stage.
What about when we have 10 million image deselection
categories in all 300 languages? Who makes the judgement call that an image
is, indeed, sufficiently containing of goats soas to render it necessary to
be so-categorised?
What are you talking about?
Block-all-images is a sensible, neutral, and, most
critically,
'''scalable''' system.
What's not scalable?