On 1/19/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Not exactly, but by those who would want standards to
do least harm, or
who would like peace in the community. If you want to take that
personally that's your problem.
Strangly I would argue my standards would cause the least harm and I
certianly want peace in the community.
That statement seems on a par with those people who
say that they have a
best friend that's black.
I fail to see the logic. The above also appears to be an appeal to emotion
Who would be so fucking foolish as to twist praise for
civil
disobedience into an accusation of disruption.
Civil disobedience also causes dissruption. That is the whole point.
It doesn't take much rethinking to reaffirm what I
said. There are
whole countries where any suggestion that it can promulgate unjust laws
would result in severe consequences. Was it my error to believe that
Wikipedia was not one of those countries?
Wikipedia is not a country.
That kind of rule parrotting suggests that you
don't spend a hell of a
lot of time looking at the financial pages of newspapers.
Ec
What is your chain of logic here?
--
geni