On 2/20/07, Mark Ryan <ultrablue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/02/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm with Oskar. If they call various
administrators abusive they should be
able to back that up.
Ah, but the emails in question contained diffs which they claimed
shewed that the administrators in question were "abusive". Should
those have been let through?
Calling someone "abusive" is still an ad hominem statement. Rather
than saying "Admin X is abusive!1!" the person should say "Admin X
engaged in behaviour on Y page that seemed abusive to me, here's some
diffs..."
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com