Abigail Brady wrote:
On 13/09/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In my opinion, an admin can ignore AFD
"consensus" when following
it would harm the encyclopedia.
Kelly
Oh please no. Name anything that could harm wikipedia that doean't
get delt with as a speedy or a copyvio.
Original hoaxes. (not speedyable)
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate and call [[WP:NOR]] - but that's not
a speedy criteria, because an article is no longer original research as
soon as references are added.
The proposal of "speedy or nothing" seems to be an attempt to move
towards writing a bot that will detecting CSDs and act appropriately. It
will never work. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think I'm
quite capable of judging for myself what I do and don't want to be on
Wikipedia. I don't need a bot or a set of rules saying "anything can
stay unless it's X, Y, or Z" to decide for me.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \