On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Charles Matthews
<
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
On 17 May 2012 17:32, Durova
<nadezhda.durova(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That conclusion would be far more convincing if
you weren't who you are.
That's [[ad hominem]] against Carcharoth, and you really need either
to withdraw it, or back it up. The former option is much preferable.
Charles
That reaction certainly comes as a surprise. Why would you construe an
attack or a fallacy?
In any meaningful experiment the researcher attempts to reduce the
variables to a single factor. Surely you'll agree that an established
registered editor's contributions might encounter a different degree of
scrutiny from an unregistered IP's edits. Carcharoth himself concedes the
possibility. What need could there be to apologize for agreeing?