On 4/20/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps I should be clearer; I'm not trying to
talk about the
not-very-good article currently there, but rather the philosophical
issue of having the article at all, which seems to be the issue here.
Anyone wanting to tear down a shitty article has my blessing, but we
should be wary of declaring a subject bad simply because an attempt to
cover it was bad.
Fair enough. I don't disagree with you that something useful could be
put where the current article sits.
Anthony