Sam Korn wrote:
On 11/17/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
What's your basis for saying that they are
worthless? Putting them in a
separate "fun stuff" section makes it clear that these are not the most
"important" facts about the subject.
We are an encyclopaedia, not a fan site. Almost always, these points
bear no relation to the rest of the article, are unsourced, and make
the article read badly. They are a net loss to the encyclopaedia.
How is it that there is no relation? These trivia still need to relate
to the subject of the article. Almost everything in the Guinness Book
of Records is trivial, and it has been consistently popular
The facts therein can almost always be written into the
text of the
article. If they can't, the fact is almost certainly too irrelevant
to mention.
We're not building an encyclopedia of pomposity!
Ec