On 2/25/07, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Of course by keeping an articles history available you
respect the
GFDL, even if you do not appreciate it and wish not to have it
immediately available. You wouldn't want to actually do that now...
Would you? Afterall, the whole debacle relies on Wikipedia being able
to destroy GFDL'd content.
The GFDL doesn't require anyone to distribute the texts that it
covers, and Wikipedia is no different from anyone else in this respect
- it's under no obligation to continue to distribute the articles
which are contributed to it. All that the GFDL requires of Wikipedia
is that it keep track of who's contributed to the text that's
available.